PaperBridge

OpenReview

Category: Discussion · Official site: https://openreview.net/

Read reviews, rebuttals, and scores where available.

Conference submission evaluation often hides reviewer disagreements and author counterarguments behind private committee portals. This resource is designed for authors and researchers who want visibility into the formal peer assessment process. Choose it over unverified community forums or inline margin tools when you want to examine official reviewer ratings, comprehensive referee reports, and detailed author rebuttals linked directly to conference submissions where review data is publicly hosted.

It belongs to the discussion step of a reading workflow: checking what other researchers, reviewers and readers made of a paper before you rely on it.

On PaperBridge you do not need to rebuild this link by hand for every paper: the app substitutes the arXiv ID (and, where a service needs it, the title or DOI) into the service's own URL pattern. The site was reachable when last checked; the button below opens it for the example paper.

Open with an example paper Try it on PaperBridge

Example paper: Attention Is All You Need (arXiv:1706.03762). The first button opens OpenReview for that paper; the second opens the paper's PaperBridge page, where every tool is one click away.

Related workflow

This tool earns its place inside a timed triage pass — the guide shows, minute by minute, where it fits and how to combine it with summaries, figures, and AI questions before you commit to a full read. Read: How to Read an arXiv Paper in 15 Minutes.

More Discussion tools

See the full tool directory or the Discussion category page.